Neither tier provides fast access to files. If you are storing data with very little intent to ever retrieve it, AWS's Glacier and Glacier Deep Archive tiers of storage are actually cheaper than Backblaze B2. You want a much simpler pricing structure to work with.You want cheap storage pricing but need fast and frequent access to your files.You are looking to store a backup of your data on another provider, or have to store data over long periods of time for archival and compliance purposes.□ Strongly consider Backblaze B2 over S3 if You need some of the more management-oriented native features on Amazon S3, like the ability to tag resources.AWS's Glacier and Glacier Deep Archive tiers of storage are actually cheaper than Backblaze B2, although neither tier provides fast access to files.There is a lot of intra-regional data traffic between storage buckets and other cloud services on the same provider.You are doing a lot of data analytics off your stored data (e.g., S3 to Snowflake).While both providers promote an 100 compatible S3 API, they are not exactly the same in implementation and may have different restrictions compared to the AWS S3 API. You overwrite or delete a considerable amount of your files within 90 days of upload. For subsequent years standard billing will apply. □ Strongly consider Amazon S3 over Backblaze B2 if Strongly consider Backblaze over Wasabi if. IDrive ® e2 vs Backblaze B2 Get Hot S3 Compatible Storage today Note: The pricing discount is valid for the first year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |